Women and India’s Digital Policy: Access Has Grown. Has Agency Kept Up?

34

The Quick Read

• India’s digital infrastructure has expanded dramatically through Aadhaar, UPI, BharatNet, Common Services Centres, direct-benefit transfers and large-scale digital-literacy programmes. UPI alone processed more than 23 billion transactions in May 2026.
• Women have benefited substantially. More than half of PMGDISHA’s participants were women in the programme’s earlier gender-disaggregated reporting, and women are increasingly using digital payments, banking tools and online business platforms.
• But India’s 2025 official telecom survey found that only 56.2% of women aged 15+ personally owned a mobile phone, compared with 83.9% of men.
• Internet use is improving rapidly, particularly among younger women. Yet among all people aged 15+, 63.1% of women had used the internet in the previous three months, compared with 76.7% of men.
• The gap becomes larger when digital use becomes more sophisticated: 37% of women aged 15+ said they could perform online banking transactions, against 60.5% of men. Only 12.7% of women said they could report cybercrime through the online portal, compared with 22.7% of men.
• India’s next digital-policy challenge is therefore not connectivity alone. Women need personal devices, usable skills, safety, privacy, control over money and pathways from digital access to economic opportunity.

Women and India’s Digital Policy: An introduction

India can move money into a woman’s bank account without her visiting a branch. She can authenticate her identity through Aadhaar, pay a shopkeeper through UPI, apply for services online, speak to a doctor remotely, learn through a phone and sell products to customers she has never met.

That is an extraordinary change in a relatively short period. Yet the same woman may not own the phone she uses.

She may know how to watch a video but not create a document. She may receive a government transfer but depend on somebody else to withdraw it. And she may use WhatsApp every day but have no idea how to report an online impersonation or financial fraud.

That is where the debate around women and India’s digital policy becomes more interesting than the usual argument about whether Digital India has succeeded or failed.  

Both claims are too simple. India has built digital infrastructure at extraordinary scale. Women are undeniably using it. Some gender gaps are narrowing, especially among younger users. But infrastructure and independence are not the same achievement.

The policy challenge now is to ensure that a woman can own, understand, control and safely use the digital systems increasingly required for economic and civic life.

First, acknowledge how much India has actually built

Any serious critique must begin here. India’s digital-policy story contains genuine achievements.

Aadhaar has created a portable digital identity infrastructure at enormous scale. UIDAI says more than 142 crore Aadhaar numbers had been generated by September 2025. The system supports identity authentication for government benefits, banking, telecom services and other uses.

UPI has changed everyday payments. NPCI recorded more than 23.2 billion UPI transactions worth nearly ₹29.9 lakh crore in May 2026 alone.

Government services have moved online. Direct-benefit infrastructure allows money to reach accounts with fewer intermediaries. Common Services Centres bring digital public services into communities where individual access may be weak. BharatNet has extended broadband infrastructure towards rural India.

Digital literacy has also received attention. The Pradhan Mantri Gramin Digital Saksharta Abhiyan trained 6.39 crore people before concluding in March 2024. Government reporting from December 2022 showed women accounting for more than 54% of those trained and more than 56% of those certified at that stage.

More recently, initiatives such as Yashoda AI have begun teaching women in rural and semi-urban areas about artificial intelligence, cyber security, privacy and safer online practices.

India therefore does not have a policy system that has ignored women completely. The more accurate criticism is that women have often been successfully included as beneficiaries and users before being equally equipped as independent digital actors.

That distinction changes the conversation.

The first gap: A household may have a phone. The woman may not.

This may be the most important number in the entire discussion. India’s Comprehensive Modular Survey: Telecom 2025 found that 83.9% of men aged 15 and above owned a mobile phone. Among women, the figure was 56.2%.

The rural difference is even starker. Among people aged 15+, 80.7% of rural men owned a phone compared with only 48.4% of rural women. In urban areas, ownership reached 90% among men and 71.8% among women.

India simultaneously reports high household smartphone availability. The same government survey found that about 85.5% of households possessed at least one smartphone. We must read those two numbers together.

A smartphone in the house is not necessarily a smartphone in a woman’s hand. Sometimes, a device may belong to a husband, son or household collectively. A woman may borrow it when available. She may share a number. She may use the phone for communication while someone else controls the SIM, password, data recharge or banking authentication.

Digital policy frequently measures infrastructure at the household level because that is useful for connectivity planning. Gender inclusion needs a second measure: Does the woman herself have reliable access?

Personal ownership matters because modern digital life increasingly depends on identity tied to a device. OTP authentication. Banking. Job applications. Government portals. Learning platforms. Telemedicine. Professional networking. Two-factor security.

Shared access works until privacy matters. Then ownership becomes power.

Change in Content has earlier examined the gendered digital divide in mobile ownership and internet use. The latest government data suggests progress has occurred, particularly among younger women, but the ownership question remains substantial.

The second gap: Internet access has improved faster than digital capability

There is encouraging news here. Among Indians aged 15 to 29, internet use is now very high. The 2025 government survey found that 91.3% of young women aged 15–29 had used the internet during the previous three months, compared with 95.9% of young men. Among women aged 15–24, the figure reached 92.3%.

That is a very different India from the one suggested by older digital-divide statistics. And it matters. Young women are entering the internet in large numbers. But widen the age group to everyone aged 15 and above and the gender gap reappears.

Internet use: Men: 76.7% and Women: 63.1%

The generational divide suggests that India has made substantial progress on connectivity while older and more marginalised women remain much further behind. The next problem appears when we ask what people can actually do online.

Among Indians aged 15+, the same official survey found:

That is where the phrase digital literacy needs an upgrade.

Being able to use YouTube, WhatsApp or Instagram is digital participation. It does not automatically mean someone can:

• Upload a CV
• Fill a complex government form
• Compare financial products
• Create an invoice
• Identify a phishing attempt
• Use a spreadsheet
• Protect an account
• Verify misinformation
• Navigate a workplace platform
• Understand AI-generated content
• Lodge a cybercrime complaint

India’s earlier digital-literacy programmes were designed for an important first problem: getting people comfortable with devices and basic internet use.

The next problem is deeper. A woman who enters the digital economy in 2026 needs digital capability, not merely familiarity.

That is why Change in Content’s Digital Literacy for Women 2026 guide argued for five layers: access, skills, safety, professional growth and accountability. Digital literacy now affects work, money and rights, not simply device usage.

The third gap: Financial inclusion can exist without financial control

India has made some of its most impressive digital advances in finance. Aadhaar-enabled authentication, Jan Dhan accounts, mobile connectivity, direct transfers and UPI have together reduced the friction involved in entering formal financial systems.

The Economic Survey 2025–26 highlighted how digital payments can generate transaction histories, reduce costs and expand access to formal credit. Regions combining affordable internet with greater banking penetration experienced particularly strong credit expansion.

Women are participating. The 2026 DBS Bank India Women and Finance Study, which Change in Content analysed earlier, found strong digital-finance adoption among the women it surveyed. Among female entrepreneurs, 84% used digital payment tools, while 72% used UPI. 

That is meaningful progress. But national skills data reveals another side.

Only 37% of women aged 15+ reported being able to perform an online banking transaction, compared with 60.5% of men. Among rural women, the corresponding figure was just 17.1%, while rural men were at 50.4%.

That is a very large gap. It tells us why bank account ownership cannot be the finishing metric for financial inclusion.

Questions of control follow:

• Does she operate the account herself?
• Does she know the PIN?
• Does somebody else perform transactions for her?
• Can she identify a fraudulent payment request?
• Can she use UPI independently?
• Can she compare loans?
• Can she see where her government benefit went?
• Can she change the registered mobile number without assistance?
• Can she access credit rather than merely receive transfers?

India has become remarkably good at moving money digitally. The next achievement is ensuring women can move, manage and grow that money themselves.

Our earlier story on women-led banking points in India illustrates one promising route. Local women operating banking access points can combine digital infrastructure with trust, language and human assistance.

Technology works differently when the last mile understands the person using it.

The fourth gap: Safety determines how freely women use the internet

A digital economy cannot call a woman connected if participation requires constant fear. Women encounter impersonation, stalking, morphing, non-consensual image sharing, deepfakes, fraud, sexual harassment and threats online.

The government has acknowledged the problem.

India operates the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal with a particular focus on offences against women and children. The Cyber Crime Prevention against Women and Children scheme has funded forensic and training capacity across states and Union Territories. In March 2026, the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre also organised a national dialogue specifically on online crimes targeting women and children.

The policy response exists. But consider the user side.

Only 12.7% of women aged 15 and above in the government’s 2025 telecom survey said they were able to complain about cybercrime or report cyber fraud through the online portal.

Among men, 22.7% said they could do so. Among rural women, the figure was only 8.3%. That is an important digital-policy failure point.

A grievance system that exists online has limited protective value if the people most likely to need it do not know how to use it.

Cyber safety cannot therefore remain an awareness poster telling women not to share OTPs. Women need to know:

• What constitutes cybercrime
• Which evidence to preserve
• Where to report it
• How quickly intimate images can be escalated
• What to do after account takeover
• How to secure devices
• How deepfake abuse is handled
• Which police or helpline route applies
• What happens after a complaint is filed

As India moves deeper into AI-generated media, this becomes urgent. The government itself has recognised growing threats including fake profiles, cyber harassment, deepfakes and non-consensual sharing of women’s images.

Safety influences participation.

• A woman repeatedly harassed online may stop posting professionally.
• A founder may avoid public visibility.
• A journalist may reduce engagement.
• A young woman may leave a platform entirely.

The digital divide is therefore partly a freedom-to-be-visible divide.

The fifth gap: Women can enter the digital economy and still remain near its lower-value edge

Connectivity has created significant economic opportunities. Women can teach online, sell products, perform platform work, provide remote professional services, create content, manage customers and run digital businesses.

For women constrained by geography, commuting, safety or caregiving, that flexibility can be transformative. But digital work also reproduces offline hierarchies.

Women may become concentrated in:

• Data annotation
• Content moderation
• Beauty and care platforms
• Low-value freelance work
• Home-based digital tasks
• Online selling with thin margins
• Administrative support
• Repetitive AI-training work

Change in Content’s earlier analysis of women and the future of digital work in India made this distinction clear. Digital entry can widen economic participation, but women also need routes into higher-value roles in analytics, AI operations, supervision, technology management, digital marketing and entrepreneurship. The same applies to the gig economy.

Digital platforms can make work accessible while leaving workers with unstable income, algorithmic control and limited protections. Our Women and Gig Work in India analysis explored exactly that trade-off.

A successful digital policy should therefore ask more than: How many women came online?

It should ask: What did coming online enable them to become?

User? Beneficiary? Worker? Seller? Borrower? Founder? Engineer? AI developer? Platform owner? Policy designer?

The hierarchy matters.

India’s digital policy has often been gender-aware. It has not always been gender-intentional.

There is a difference.

A gender-aware policy recognises women as a group requiring inclusion. A gender-intentional policy designs the system around the specific barriers that could prevent that inclusion from working.

India has several examples of the first.

• PMGDISHA explicitly prioritised marginalised groups, including women. Government data showed women becoming the majority of beneficiaries in parts of the programme.
• The National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal specifically recognises crimes against women and children.
• The Women Entrepreneurship Platform supports women building businesses.
• Mahila E-Haat was built around women entrepreneurs.
• Yashoda AI targets women’s AI literacy and online safety.

These are meaningful interventions. But the larger digital system is often designed as though the user already has:

• A personal device
• A private SIM
• Literacy
• Time
• Digital confidence
• A bank account she controls
• Privacy at home
• English or strong reading ability
• Freedom to transact independently
• A safe environment in which to be online

Many women do. Millions do not.

The system then labels them digitally included because their household is connected or their Aadhaar is linked. Policy needs a more demanding definition.

What does the newest data tell us? Progress is generational.

One finding prevents this story from becoming unnecessarily pessimistic. Young women are closing some gaps quickly. 

Among people aged 15–29:

• 95.9% of men and 91.3% of women used the internet.
• 83.3% of men and 63% of women owned a mobile phone.
• 79.3% of men and 57.5% of women reported being able to perform online banking.

Internet use is approaching parity much faster than ownership and sophisticated digital use. That gives policymakers a clue. The access battle is changing. 

For the next generation, the priorities should move towards: ownership to capability to safety to economic conversion.

If India focuses only on connectivity, policy will keep solving yesterday’s problem.

What would a women-first digital policy look like now?

India does not need an entirely separate internet for women. It needs gender outcomes embedded inside mainstream digital policy.

1. Measure personal ownership, not household availability

Every major digital-inclusion dashboard should report individual access by sex, age, rural/urban location, income and relevant social categories.

Household connectivity remains useful. Personal device control should sit beside it.

2. Move beyond first-level digital literacy

The successor to basic digital-literacy programmes should teach:

• Online banking
• Cybersecurity
• AI literacy
• Government-service navigation
• Digital documents
• E-commerce
• Job applications
• Cloud tools
• Fraud identification
• Privacy controls
• Business use of technology

Training should reflect what digital participation means in 2026 rather than 2017.

3. Make assisted digital access a permanent feature

Not everybody will become fully self-sufficient online at the same pace. Common Services Centres, banking correspondents, libraries, panchayats and other community institutions can provide trusted assistance.

More women should operate these points.

In SC/ST-dominated areas, only around 10% of CSCs were being managed by women as of July 2025. That leaves considerable room to increase women’s role not merely as service recipients but as the people delivering digital services.

4. Build safety into products before abuse happens

Platforms, fintechs, government portals and AI systems should use gender-responsive threat modelling.

Ask how a feature could enable:

• Stalking
• Impersonation
• Surveillance
• Non-consensual image use
• Financial coercion
• Location exposure
• Household monitoring

Safety features should be understandable to people without technical knowledge.

5. Simplify cybercrime reporting

If only a small share of women know how to use the reporting system, awareness must become a policy metric.

Reporting should work across:

• Web
• Mobile
• Helplines
• Police stations
• CSCs
• Assisted channels

Women should not need digital sophistication to report a digital offence.

6. Measure whether digital finance produces financial agency

Government and financial institutions should go beyond account openings and transaction totals.

Track:

• Independent account use
• Women’s use of UPI
• Credit access
• Digital savings
• Insurance
• Investment participation
• Fraud losses
• Business finance
• Control over DBT funds

A successful digital payment system should eventually produce stronger economic decision-making.

7. Connect digital skills directly with income

Training programmes should have pathways into:

• Jobs
• Freelancing
• Procurement
• Entrepreneurship
• Higher-level technology training
• AI roles
• Remote work
• Government marketplace opportunities

Certificates should not become the final outcome. Income, business growth and career mobility matter more.

8. Design AI inclusion before the next gender gap hardens

India is investing heavily in artificial intelligence through the IndiaAI Mission, including compute, datasets, applications, future skills, startup financing and safe and trusted AI.

Women need to enter this ecosystem early. Otherwise, India risks narrowing one digital gap while creating another.

Change in Content has already examined AI and employment risk for women. Women should not be disproportionately displaced from routine digital jobs and then underrepresented in the higher-value AI roles replacing them. The policy window is open now.

The biggest rethink: Stop treating women as the “last mile”

The phrase appears constantly in digital-development conversations. How do we reach the last mile?

Women, rural communities and marginalised groups are often located there conceptually. But women are not the final users of somebody else’s digital transformation. They are half the potential workforce. They are entrepreneurs. Consumers. Farmers. Students. Public officials. Banking agents. Care workers. Creators. Engineers. Investors. Voters.

Hence, women should influence how digital systems are designed from the beginning.

That requires women inside product teams, regulatory bodies, AI governance discussions, fintech design, cybersecurity, public-service delivery and technology leadership.

Digital inclusion becomes stronger when the person designing the system understands the life of the person expected to use it.

The Change in Content Perspective: India Built the Rails. Now Give Women the Driver’s Seat.

It would be unfair to describe India’s digital journey as a failure for women. 

Millions of women can now access money, information, government services, customers, education and work in ways that were far harder a decade ago. The progress is visible. So are the gaps.

• A country where 63.1% of women aged 15+ recently used the internet has moved considerably forward.
• A country where only 56.2% of those women own a phone, 37% can bank online, and 12.7% know how to report cybercrime still has unfinished work.

Both statements belong in the same article. The next phase of Digital India should therefore move beyond asking whether women have been connected.

• Ask whether they have control.
• Can she access the device when she needs it?
• Can she use digital money without assistance?
• Can she protect herself?
• Can she complain when something goes wrong?
• Can she turn connectivity into income?
• Can she learn the technologies shaping tomorrow’s jobs?
• Can she build the platform rather than merely work through it?

India has already demonstrated that policy can transform access at enormous scale. The opportunity now is more ambitious.

Build a digital economy in which women do not merely appear in the user numbers. They should possess the skills, safety, money and authority to determine what those numbers are worth.

 

Editorial Note and Disclaimer

This Policy Pulse article draws on official Government of India data on telecom access, digital literacy, Aadhaar, cybercrime prevention and public digital programmes, alongside primary research on the mobile gender gap. Different surveys use different age groups, definitions and reference periods, so figures should not be compared without context. The article assesses digital policy through a gender-inclusion lens and does not suggest that any individual programme has uniformly succeeded or failed women across India. It is intended for editorial and informational purposes and does not constitute legal, financial, cybersecurity or policy advice.

Sources

1. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation: Comprehensive Modular Survey — Telecom, 2025
2. NPCI: UPI Product Statistics
3. Unique Identification Authority of India: Aadhaar Ecosystem and Authentication
4. Ministry of Electronics and IT: PMGDISHA Outcomes
5. Ministry of Home Affairs: Cyber Crime Prevention Against Women and Children
6. GSMA: Mobile Gender Gap Report 2026
7. Economic Survey 2025–26